The community built for founders

I started the company from my apartment in India. Most of my customers are in the US. On paper, that sounds pretty normal now. The internet makes geography feel irrelevant. In practice, it isn't always. My workday starts when some of my US customers are still asleep. By the time I'm getting into the really important part of my day, they're already finishing theirs. A customer sends a message at 10pm my time and I know that if it's something important, I'm probably dealing with it before going to bed. Sales calls were another adjustment. I initially tried to fit everything around my own working hours. That didn't work particularly well. So I started taking calls much later than I was used to. Some days I'm talking to customers at 9:30 or 10pm, then going back to development afterwards. There are also smaller things. Pricing in dollars while paying most of my expenses in rupees. Understanding how American customers describe problems. Figuring out which holidays actually affect my users. Learning that something I considered a "small delay" can mean a completely different thing when a customer is waiting for an issue to be fixed during their workday. But there's one thing I really like about it. I'm not limited to the market around me. I can wake up in India, build the product here, talk to a customer in California, get feedback from someone in New York and have revenue coming from a market I've never physically visited. I used to think being far away from your customers was a disadvantage. Now I'm starting to think the bigger challenge is simply designing your company around the distance. Different timezone. Different market. Different expectations. Still the same product.

I'm trying to understand something I keep seeing in Google Search Console. My impressions have been going up almost every day, but my average position has been getting worse. A few weeks ago I was around position 12–15. Now I'm seeing something closer to 20. At first I thought Google was simply pushing my pages down, but then I noticed that my impressions were actually increasing quite a lot at the same time. So I'm confused. If I'm ranking worse, why is Google showing my pages more often? The only explanation I can think of is that I'm starting to appear for more keywords where I'm ranking much lower, which is pulling the average position down. For example, maybe I used to get most of my impressions from a handful of keywords around position 10, and now I'm appearing for hundreds of additional searches around positions 30–60. That would technically make the average position worse while the site's overall search visibility is improving. But I'm not sure if that's actually how Search Console calculates it. Has anyone here watched this happen with a relatively new website? Did your average position fall while impressions increased, and did the position eventually recover as Google gathered more data and your pages moved higher? I'm trying to figure out whether this is normal growth or something I should actually investigate.

I'm starting to run into a problem I didn't really think about when I launched. Most of my users are on the free plan. Which is fine. I actually want people to be able to try the product without pulling out a credit card. The problem is that "free" isn't actually free for me. Every user creates some cost somewhere. Database storage. API requests. File storage. Bandwidth. Emails. Background jobs. Third-party APIs. When I had 50 users, I barely noticed any of it. At 500, I started paying attention. Now I'm looking at what happens if usage grows another 10x and I'm realizing that I can't just keep adding free users forever without understanding the unit economics. The confusing part is that I don't want to put artificial limits everywhere. For example, telling someone they can only use the product 5 times a month might make my costs predictable, but it could also prevent them from getting enough value to ever become a paying customer. At the same time, I don't want someone using a feature heavily for free while I'm quietly paying more to serve them than they will ever pay me. So I'm trying to figure out where other founders draw the line. Do you put limits on the free plan based on actual infrastructure cost? Do you let free users consume as much as they want and rely on a small percentage converting? Or do you only restrict the expensive features? I'm especially curious about products where the cost per active user isn't close to zero. At what point did you realize your free plan was becoming an actual expense instead of just a growth strategy?

Enquanto um projeto ainda não deu certo, as pessoas vão nos chamar de teimosos ou loucos por continuar tentando. Mas quando a ideia finalmente funciona depois de anos de esforço, essa mesma opinião muda completamente. Aquilo que antes chamavam de loucura passa a ser visto como genialidade ou visão de mercado. No fundo, a ideia não mudou e o processo continuou sendo o mesmo; o mundo é que só valida o esforço depois que ele traz resultados.