FeedLaunchesDiscussionsOpportunitiesToolkits New Members
Sarah Peterson
Sarah Peterson@sarahpeterson
0Products

Founder of Miro hairs - Multi media award winner

The most fascinating thing about building is creating an opportunity for others to excel and sustain under your leadership (Coach) Let me hold your hands to passive income.

Miro Hairs LTD · COO Lagos, Nigeria Joined 4 months ago
Badges (2)

Sarah's Posts (6)

Sarah PetersonSarah Peterson·1wk
discussion
Your startup probably doesn’t need more features. It needs more conversations with users. Here’s how I’d spend the next 7 days.

One of the easiest traps as a founder is convincing yourself that the next feature will fix everything. More features. Better dashboard. New onboarding flow. Another integration. Another redesign. Meanwhile, the people already using your product are quietly telling you what needs to be fixed. You just aren't asking. If I had a startup today and felt stuck, I wouldn't spend the next 7 days building. I'd spend them talking to users. Day 1: Talk to 5 users Not a survey. Not an automated email. Actually talk to them. I'd ask: “What were you trying to accomplish when you signed up?” “What almost made you stop using us?” “What do you wish our product did better?” Day 2: Talk to people who left This might be even more valuable. I'd find users who signed up but never became active and ask them one simple question: “What stopped you?” Don't defend the product. Don't explain why they were wrong. Listen. Day 3: Watch someone use the product I'd get 3 people to share their screen while using the product. I'd say nothing unless they get completely stuck. Where they hesitate is information. Where they click the wrong thing is information. Where they say “I don't understand this” is information. Your analytics can tell you what happened. Watching users can show you why. Day 4: Read every complaint Support tickets. Emails. Comments. DMs. Reviews. Refund reasons. I'd put everything into one document and look for patterns. If 7 people independently complain about the same thing, that's probably not 7 separate problems. It's one product problem appearing 7 times. Day 5: Talk to people who love the product Ask your happiest users: “What would make you completely disappointed if we removed it tomorrow?” This tells you what your product actually delivers that people value. You might discover that the feature you thought was your biggest selling point isn't the reason people stay. Day 6: Turn conversations into a priority list Now I'd divide everything I learned into three buckets: Keep: Things users clearly value. Fix: Things creating friction. Ignore: Things founders think are important but users don't care about. Then I'd pick one problem. Not ten. One. Day 7: Build only what you learned Now you can open your code editor. But instead of building the feature you think users want, you're building something users have already told you they need. That's a completely different way to build. The uncomfortable truth is that sometimes the reason your startup isn't growing isn't because you're missing a feature. It's because you're solving the wrong problem really well. So before you add another feature this week, try something different: Talk to 10 users. You might discover that your next feature has already been sitting inside your users' complaints for months. Founders: when was the last time you actually talked to a user about your product?

Sarah PetersonSarah Peterson·3wk
discussion
Claude Code just saved me about 20 hours of development

I had a feature I thought would take me several days to build. Instead of starting from scratch, I gave Claude Code the context of the project, explained what I wanted, and let it work through the implementation with me. The interesting part wasn't that it generated code. It was how much of the boring work disappeared. Setting things up, connecting the pieces, handling edge cases, fixing small errors, going back and forth between files... all the little things that normally eat hours. I still had to review the code, test everything and fix a few things myself. But the amount of actual development time it removed was honestly surprising. I'm starting to think the bigger advantage of AI coding isn't necessarily that it replaces developers. It's that one person can now move through an idea much faster. Curious how much time Claude Code has actually saved other builders here?

Sarah PetersonSarah Peterson·3mo
discussion
This images are generated by Chatgpt new model gpt5.1 and grok image which one is more realistic

This is beautiful i recently started creating and experimenting with AI image models and the images attached are my testings lol i nailed it with realistic prompting guys which model performs best share your thought