AI Made Building a Startup Easy. So Why Is Getting Customers Still So Hard?
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately.
A few years ago, one of the hardest parts of starting a software company was actually building the software. You needed developers, designers, time, money, and sometimes months of work just to get something usable in front of people.
Now?
You can have an idea in the morning, use AI to help you build it, deploy it, and have something real to show people by the evening.
That part has become ridiculously easier.
But then you launch it and realize something uncomfortable:
Nobody cares.
You can build the product faster than ever, but you still can’t force people to use it.
And I think this is where a lot of founders are getting stuck.
AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building software, but it hasn't reduced the difficulty of earning attention and trust. In fact, it may have made that problem worse.
Because when everyone can build faster, there are suddenly more products competing for the same limited attention.
Your product isn't competing only with companies that raised millions anymore. It is competing with another founder who spent their weekend building something similar with AI.
So the advantage is slowly moving away from "Can you build it?"
It is becoming:
Can you get someone to notice it?
Can you explain why they should care?
Can you earn enough trust for them to try it?
Can you get them to come back?
This is also why I’m starting to think distribution is becoming one of the most important founder skills.
You don't necessarily need to become an influencer or spend thousands on ads.
But you do need to learn how to talk to people, find where your users already hang out, create useful conversations, build relationships, and consistently put your product in front of the right audience.
AI can help you build the product.
It can write your landing page.
It can help with your emails.
It can even help you research your market.
But it can't magically make people care.
And honestly, I think that's a good thing.
Because if building becomes almost free, maybe the real test of a startup isn't who can build the fastest anymore.
Maybe it's who can understand people the best.
What do you think is harder today: building the product or getting the first 100 customers?
Sign in to join the discussion
I sometimes think the real value is behind concrete proof that this will work I started building an app for my wife she has started talking about it on her Tiktok page so far 6,000 females on the wait-list and am still not thrilled until it get to 10K sometimes you just need a co-founder or Co-Whatever majority of this complaints are mainly solo-founders now the real deal are 2 head is better than 1
10K target is super valid at least you can expect reality from there, but Kevin don't you think you should start building now to anticipate your 10K users with a quick launch. U never can tell.
This is beautiful piece
Getting the first 100 customers is the hardest part infact i have been stucked at 10 users since i launched my prodct - Sometimes i question myself how easy would it had been building a multi-million dollar company with just 20$ and 0 marketing then i realize that building was the Trap marketing is the Hook Both never worked handy.
You have nailed it all marketing is the barier between building and realizing, i guess i didn't fall into the trap because i haven't built yet but i have a waitlist trying to get users to join over the next 30 days if i get enough users to join i will consider that a win - build else case close
How do you know when it a win and start building the app for it ?
You have said it all Gerald Building is never the case distribution is and I strongly believe this is going to last for a while before an era change it.
Gerald, I think the fact that you already have 10 users is important. Rather than treating 100 as the next problem, I'd be looking very closely at how those first 10 arrived — who they are, what made them try it, and what happened between first contact and becoming a user. There may already be a repeatable acquisition signal in that small group. How did you get those first 10?